Legal Opinion

McNeese v. McNeese

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1923No. L. A. No. 7270PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Russ Avery, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Plaintiff in this action was on the twenty-sixth day of January, 1920, duly adjudged an in competent person and H. Parker Wood was appointed guardian of Ms estate. Thereafter on the twenty-fifth day of May, 1920, an action in claim and delivery was instituted by said guardian in behalf of said incompetent for the recovery from the possession of the defendant of a certain Buick automobile formerly owned by said incompetent. Plaintiff and defendant are respectively father and son.

The allegations of the complaint were the usual allegations in actions of claim and delivery. In addition thereto it…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Paularena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API