More v. More
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. C. F. Carrier, and Richards & Carrier, for Thomas R. More, Appellant. C. A. Storke, for A. L. Den, Appellant, and for H. J. Finger and E. F. Rogers, Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
The plaintiff Wallace More is one of the heirs of A. P. More, deceased, his interest in the estate being one twenty-seventh of the whole, and of the value of ten thousand dollars. The plaintiff Louisa is his wife, and by Virtue of a deed made to her by him, January 5,1895, has succeeded to whatever interest he had in the estate at that date. Theidefendant Thomas More is the grantee in three several deeds executed to him by Wallace More, purporting to convey to him ihe whole interest of the grantor in the estate,—one of date October 21, 1893, one of date October 30, 1893 (in fact…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Keating v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.