McCall v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
By this proceeding we are required to redeclare the distinction between an action to secure the beneficial results which arise from a unilateral rescission of a contract already accomplished (rescission in pais) and an action in equity to compel a rescission and to secure an award by decree of the benefits resulting therefrom. We are also required to declare whether or not, under the law of attachment (sec. 537 of the Code of Civ. Proe.), a suit for return of the consideration paid upon a contract, after a rescission in pais for fraud, is an action upon a contract, express or implied, for the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.