Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-Pietra
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this action demurrers interposed by defendants to plaintiffs’ amended complaint were sustained with leave to plaintiffs to amend. Plaintiffs failed to amend, and judgment was thereupon given for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal from such judgment. The amended complaint, as we read it, states substantially the following facts: Defendant Schiappa-Pietra (hereafter referred to as Pietra) was the owner of a tract of land in Ventura County, consisting of 6,962.31 acres, part of the Rancho Santa Clara del Norte, and 5,375 shares of the capital stock of the Santa Clara Water and Irrigating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Thackrah v. HaasSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Carruth v. FritchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.