Legal Opinion

Paularena v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1965No. Civ. 7930PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The petitioners were the purchasers of homes under land sales contracts. In July 1962 they filed a complaint in the respondent court alleging causes of action for damages sustained in connection with such purchases on account of the violation of statutory duties, negligence, breach of warranty, fraud and rescission. In the cause of action based on rescission petitioners alleged that, pursuant to the terms of their contracts, they had conferred benefits upon the defendants in the action and offered “to restore on their part all consideration heretofore received from defendants, pursuant to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API