Spreckels v. Gorrill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bishop, Wheeler & Hoefler, Charles S. Wheeler, and J. F. Bowie, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to recover money alleged to have been paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as the price of certain corporate stock. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that Gorrill was the manager of a corporation known as the Pacific Car Equipment Company; that on the fifteenth day of April, 1899, he offered to sell to Spreekels three hundred shares of the stock of said company at the price of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars; that for the purpose of inducing Spreekels to buy said stock Gorrill at that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- N. C. Antle & Bro. v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.