Legal Opinion

Philpott v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. L. A. 14359PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

By this proceeding in prohibition we are required to declare the nature of the two causes of action pleaded in the case of John Philpott, Plaintiff, v. Broadway State Bank et al., Defendants, No. 292646, now pending in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles. Petitioner asserts that the cause is one in equity of which the superior court alone has jurisdiction and that unless it is restrained by this writ, said superior court will attempt to divest itself of jurisdiction of the cause by holding that the action is one at law, involving a sum less than $2,000, to wit: $625, cognizable…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Gaines v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lectrodryer v. SeoulBankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. G.S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. v. Kalitta Flying Service, Inc. Connie Kalitta Services, Inc. Conrad A. KalittaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API