Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Owens

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1898No. S. F. No. 437PublishedCited by 54 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County and from an order denying a new trial. Joseph P. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court delivered in Department Two.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

After due consideration of this cause in Bank we are satisfied with the conclusion reached in Department; and for the reasons given in the opinion delivered in Department, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

Henshaw, J., Harrison, J., Yan Fleet, J., and Garoutte, J., concurred.

The following is the opinion rendered in Department Two, January 7, 1897:

McFARLAND, J.—On the fourteenth day of June, 1884, the plaintiff made a conveyance by deed of the land described in the complaint to H. K. Owens. The consideration of said conveyance was fifty-five thousand two hundred and forty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Burton v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  3. Gifford v. CarvillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Buena Vista Fruit & Vineyard Co. v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hammond v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API