Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Webb

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2002No. 99-07552, 99-06457, 99-01887; A110994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, SAIF seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order setting aside SAIF’s denial of responsibility for claimant’s right knee tricompartmental degenerative joint disease. SAIF argues that the Board erred when it assigned responsibility to SAIF under an “exception” to the presumption established in Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Kearns, 70 Or App 583, 690 P2d 1068 (1984). SAIF asserts that the Board should have applied the last injurious exposure rule to determine who was initially responsible for claimant’s condition. We review for substantial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. SAIF Corp. v. YokumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Conner v. B & S LOGGINGCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bluemer v. Southland IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Garoutte v. Mail Well Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. In Re Compensation of PruittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Garoutte v. Mail-Well Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API