Legal Opinion

Conner v. B & S LOGGING

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. 9501484; CA A94371PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that held that Liberty Northwest Insurance Co. was not responsible for claimant’s compensa-ble injury. We review for errors of law and substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8), and affirm.

Claimant was first injured in 1985 while working as a logger for Liberty’s insured, when he caught his foot in a branch while attempting to avoid being hit by a falling tree. He submitted a claim for a “strained, twisted knee” that was accepted by Liberty. That claim was closed in April 1986 without an award of permanent disability. Claimant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. SAIF Corp. v. YokumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Castle & Cooke v. AlcantarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Hammond v. Liberty Nw. Ins. Corp. (In re Comp. of Hammond)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API