Legal Opinion

Garoutte v. Mail Well Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 2005No. 02-02789; A121646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the board erred in upholding employer’s denial of his claim for degenerative arthritis in his left knee. We reverse and remand.

The facts are largely undisputed. Claimant has worked for employer since 1978. He compensably injured his left knee in 1984 while working for employer as a pressman. SAIF, employer’s insurer at the time, accepted the claim and paid for arthroscopic surgery. The claim was closed in June 1986, with an award of 15 percent permanent partial disability. Claimant had no further problems…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. SAIF Corp. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. SAIF Corp. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Garoutte v. Mail-Well Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Kirby v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API