Legal Opinion

Bluemer v. Southland Industries

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. 0305914, 0405613; A134338PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the issue is which of two employers is responsible for claimant’s collapsed disc at L4-5. The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) determined that the collapsed disc is a consequential condition and that claimant’s former employer, Unistrut Corporation, is responsible for it. Claimant seeks review of that determination, arguing that he suffers from a combined — not a consequential — condition that is the responsibility of his subsequent employer, Southland Industries. Additionally and alternatively, claimant asserts that the board erred in failing to treat…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Portland Ass'n of Teachers v. Multnomah School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Marvin Wood Products v. CallowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Jackson County v. WehrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blank v. US BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 757 v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API