Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Yokum
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 21, 1994No. WCB 91-14304, 91-14305, 91-14306, 91-14307, 91-14308, 91-14309, 91-17992; CA A78726PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Employer Asphalt Maintenance Associates, Inc. (AMA), seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board assigning to it responsibility for claimant’s occupational disease claim. We affirm.
Since 1974, claimant has worked as a painter for a number of employers, including AMA and Turner Painting (Turner). During his employment as a painter, he was exposed to organic solvents through inhalation and skin contact. Throughout his employment, he occasionally experienced feelings of intoxication, including light-headedness, dizziness and disorientation. He first sought treatment for that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- SAIF Corp. v. DrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Oregon Boiler Works v. LottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Silveira v. Larch EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Agricomp Insurance v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- SAIF Corp. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.