Legal Opinion
Garoutte v. Mail-Well Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 6, 2005No. 02-02789 A121646PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
115 P.3d 957 (2005)
200 Or. App. 508
In the Matter of the Compensation of Lloyd E. Garoutte, Claimant.
Lloyd E. GAROUTTE, Petitioner,
v.
MAIL WELL CORP., Respondent.
02-02789; A121646.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2004.
Decided July 6, 2005.
Donald M. Hooton argued the cause and filed the reply brief for petitioner. With him on the opening brief was William D. Okrent.
Jerald P. Keene argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge,[*] and ARMSTRONG, Judge.
ARMSTRONG, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- SAIF Corp. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- SAIF Corp. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Kirby v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007