SAIF Corp. v. Durant
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
Petitioners SAIF Corporation and its insured, MPP Piping, Inc. (MPP),1 seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that found MPP responsible for claimant’s 2011 shoulder condition as a consequential condition of claimant’s 2006 shoulder injury at MPP. MPP contends that the board erred by refusing to apply the last injurious exposure rule (LIER) to shift responsibility for the admittedly work-related shoulder condition to a later employer. MPP also contends that the board erred in concluding that claimant’s compensable injury was the major contributing cause of his 2011…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- SAIF Corp. v. DrewsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooks v. Tube Specialties - TSCO InternationalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- SAIF Corp. v. DeMarcoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Miller v. SAIF Corp. (In re Miller)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018