Legal Opinion

In Re Compensation of Pruitt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 2008No. 03-06370, 03-05293, 03-02734, 03-02733; A133993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

This case presents the interesting issue of the interplay of statutes and rules relating to the compensability of and responsibility for occupational disease claims and consequential conditions. See ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A); ORS 656.802. Employer Waste Management (WM) seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board setting aside its compensability denial of an occupational disease claim and assigning it responsibility for claimant’s degenerative condition of the left knee under the last injurious exposure rule. WM contends that it should not be held responsible, because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kepford v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. KearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Reynolds Metals v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. DiBrito v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liberty M & Saif Corp. v. Lynch Co. (In re Comp. of Alcorn)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. SAIF Corp. v. DurantCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. SAIF Corp. v. Dunn (In re Dunn)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API