Legal Opinion

Reynolds Metals v. Rogers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 1998No. 93-11544, 94-14661, 95-01825; CA A96634PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Cigna Insurance Co. (Cigna), on behalf of its insured Reynolds Metals, seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order assigning it responsibility for claimant’s right shoulder condition. Liberty Mutual (Liberty), which insured Reynolds Metals prior to Cigna, cross-petitions seeking review of the Board’s order assessing a penalty and attorney fees. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law. ORS 183.482(8); ORS 656.298(7). We affirm in part and reverse in part on the petition and affirm on the cross-petition.

Claimant began working for Reynolds Metals in 1967 and stopped…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Roseburg Forest Products v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Agricomp Insurance v. TappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Christman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. SAIF Corp. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. SAIF Corp. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. The New Portland Meadows v. DieringerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API