Legal Opinion

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Kearns

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 31, 1984No. 81-11626 and 82-05409; CA A28755PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Industrial Indemnity seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board determination that it is responsible for paying claimant aggravation benefits. The sole issue is responsibility. On de novo review, ORS 656.298(6), we affirm.

Claimant strained his low back in 1968. He was awarded 5 percent unscheduled disability when his claim was closed in 1969. He was injured again in 1972. He was awarded an additional 5 percent unscheduled disability when that claim was closed in 1973. In 1976, he filed an aggravation claim, which was accepted by stipulation. He was awarded an additional 5 percent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Mathis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Matter of Compensation of StarbuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ebbtide Enterprises v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. SAIF Corp. v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Bluemer v. Southland IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. In Re Compensation of PruittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API