Dover v. Pittsburg Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an action in equity brought by the plaintiff claiming to be the owner of twenty-nine hundred and twenty shares of the capital stock of the defendant the Pittsburg Oil Company, a corporation, and to compel said corporation to recognize the plaintiff as such owner and holder of said stock, and to place his name upon the stock-books of said corporation as the owner of the same, and to issue to him new certificates therefor, and to have the court declare the defendant E. A. Baer not the owner of said stock, nor of the certificates representing the said stock, and to haeVe the court compel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Woodsum v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by13 opinions
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Shirey v. All Night and Day BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Conklin v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Noe v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.