Legal Opinion

B. & W. Engineering Co. v. Beam

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1913No. Civ. No. 1235PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. J. J. Trabucco, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The cause of action sued, on herein was assigned to the corporation plaintiff by a pre-existing copartnership of the same name. The plaintiff sought to recover from the defendants the balance of a sum of money alleged to be due upon a contract entered into between plaintiff’s assignor, the B. & W. Engineering Company, and I. Willard Beam, wherein the latter acted for himself and as the representative of the defendant W. Jessup & Sons, Limited. Upon the death of Beam his widow was appointed as executrix of his last will and testament, and in due time a claim, founded upon the contract in suit,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wilson v. California Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Holton v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Southern Casualty Co. v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Union Local No. 162 v. Glasgow Theaters, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API