Carpy v. Dowdell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Napa County denying a new trial. E. D. Ham, Judge. ■The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Judgment went for plaintiff in the court below, and defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action is to foreclose two certain chattel mortgages executed by the appellants, Dowdell & Son, to the Bank of St. Helena upon certain wine, to secure two promissory notes given by said appellants to said bank, which were assigned to respondent immediately before the commencement of this action. The notes were overdue when assigned to respondent, and he then knew the facts upon which the defense in this case rests; and it is not seriously contended that he does not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.