Legal Opinion

Noe v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1917No. 6660PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, ■ Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by T. H. Smith against Frank R. Nee and D. A. Marlow to cancel a deed and to quiet 'title. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant Noe brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrett, J.

This action was commenced in the' district court of -Seminole county by T. H. Smith, one of the defendants in error, as plaintiff, 'against Frank R. 'Noe and D. A. Marlow, as 'defendants, to quiet title in a IBO-acre tract of land described in the petition. The material facts are:

That the land was origin-ally owned by a Seminole freedman, who in 1911 deeded the land to D. A. Marlow by general warranty 'deed for a consideration of $800. Smith, 'however, furnished the purchase in-ice of the land. Marlow later filed suit in his own name, -to cancel an outstanding spurious deed, and quiet title…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Alstin v. CundiffTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Johnson v. NewmanTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State Bank v. FrameSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Blum v. LogginsTexas Supreme Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Luschen v. StantonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Mehard v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Exchange Trust Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Young v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API