People v. Turner
California Supreme Court
Appeal Itrom a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a newX Añal. William T. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery, and from the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial prosecutes these ap*280peals. The information, it is admitted, contained two counts. By the first it is charged that the defendant, having in his possession a deed of a piece of realty made and executed by one Lizzie O’Donnell to J. P. Frenna, did “willfully, unlawfully, knowingly, feloniously, falsely, and fraudulently make and forge on the back of said deed a certificate in the handwriting of T. A. Bell, recorder of Fresno county, of the recordation of said deed.in the county…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. WeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Keller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.