Woodsum v. Cole
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action to recover the amount due on a promissory note.
The' plaintiff sues as indorsee of the note, and the defendant, by his answer, denies that the plaintiff has any right or title to the note, or any interest in the money due thereon; and alleges that one A. C. Wood-*143sum, the payee named therein, is the owner of the note and entitled to receive payment thereof, and that before the commencement of this action and since, he had directed the defendant not to pay the same to any person other than himself; and further, that A. G. Woodsum had extended the time of payment,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hays v. . HathornNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Barstow v. Savage Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
- Brewster v. SimeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Chase v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Shirey v. All Night and Day BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Conklin v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Noe v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Dover v. Pittsburg Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.