Fowles v. National Bank of California
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, from a judgment in favor of defendant, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial, in an action brought by them to recover possession of certain stock certificates representing thirty shares of stock of the Union Oil Company of California, a corporation, of which they allege themselves to be the owners and entitled to possession.
The facts of the case are established by a stipulation of the parties, which is included in a bill of exceptions. The trial court gave judgment that plaintiffs take nothing.
So far as is material to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- MacDermot v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Northwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Atlantic Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Powers v. Pacific Diesel Engine Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.