Graves v. Mono Lake Hydraulic Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mono County, and from an order refusing a new’ trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The defendant (appellant) is a mining corporation organized in this state October 4, 1881, having its principal place of business in San Francisco, and its mining land and works in the county of Mono. Its capital stock is one million dollars, divided into one hundred thousand shares, all of which was subscribed by and issued to the following persons: —
John D. Wilson, 24,950 shares; Daniel E. Jones, 24.950 shares; John Elbert, 24,950 shares; N. K. Grant, 24.950 shares; John F. Curtis, 100 shares; George Duncan, 100 shares.
The directors during the first year, named in the articles…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wardell v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Koehler v. Black River Falls Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- President & Trustees v. San Diego & Los Angeles RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Barstow v. Savage Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
- Davis v. Rock Creek L. F. & M. Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Dean v. ShingleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Powers v. Pacific Diesel Engine Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.