Shirey v. All Night and Day Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Oscar A. Trippet, and John E. Biby, for Plaintiff Ida E. Shirey. Tanner, Taft & Odell, for Appellant All Night and Day Bank. Wellborn & Wellborn, Olin Wellborn, Jr., and Alfred H. McAdoo, for W. C. Weaver, Defendant and Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
There are two appeals in this ease, one taken by defendant All Night and Day Bank, from the judgment in favor of plaintiff against it for the sum of $898.67 and costs, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial, and one taken by plaintiff from all other portions of the judgment in said action, and especially that portion thereof denying her any relief as against defendant Weaver. In so far as the appeal of the bank is concerned the record on appeal consists of the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions. The appeal of plaintiff is before us on the judgment-roll alone.
The facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Corbus v. TeedIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Brandt v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Chucovich v. San Francisco Securities Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Connick v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.