Conklin v. Benson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
Plaintiff: claiming to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in two hundred acres of land situate in Modoc County, brought this action against defendants to obtain a decree adjudging that they have no interest therein, and adjudging that a certain deed and certain powers of attorney under which defendant Walker claims to be the owner of such land are void. This land has been granted by United States patent to plaintiff and the legal representatives of the estate of Patrick Beddy, deceased, in lieu of a portion of certain land owned by them situated within the limits of the Sierra…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Schultz v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Woodsum v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Dover v. Pittsburg Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Fleming v. DolfinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fowles v. National Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Buck v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Shirey v. All Night and Day BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.