Adams v. Flora MacDonald College
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The demurrer tests the sufficiency of the complaint. The rules applicable have been often stated and are well settled. Pressly v. Walker, 238 N.C. 732, 78 S.E. 2d 920, and cases cited. Our task is to determine whether plaintiffs, upon the facts alleged, liberally construed in their favor, have a cause of action.
The complaint and exhibits show that, while legal title to the property vests in defendant, the Fayetteville, Orange and Wilmington Presbyteries of the North Carolina Synod of the Presbyterian Church in the United States are the beneficial owners of defendant, and through trustees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Mills v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Snipes v. . MondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Garrison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Seawell v. Chas. Cole & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Starbuck v. Town of HavelockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Parrish v. BrantleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Perrell v. BEATY SERVICE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Whaley v. Broadway Taxi CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.