Snipes v. . Monds
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.
Even after answering in the trial court, or in this Court, a defendant may demur ore tenus, or the Court may raise the question ex mero motu that the complaint does not state a cause of action. Garrison v. Williams, 150 N. C., 675. Construing the complaint liberally in favor of the plaintiff (Horney v. Mills, 189 N. C., 724, 728), to the end that it must be upheld unless wholly insufficient (Sexton v. Farrington, 185 N. C., 339; Blackmore v. Winders, 144 N. C., 212; Bank v. Duffy, 156 N. C., 83; Pridgen v. Pridgen, ante, 102), the demurrer must be sustained.
An executor cannot, by any contract…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Kerchner v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- New Bern Banking & Trust Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Sexton v. . FarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Alexander v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thigpen v. Farmers Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Aldridge Motors, Inc. v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Skinner v. Empresa Transformadora De Productos AgropecuariosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Lamm v. CrumplerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.