Legal Opinion

Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1954No. 382PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBakNhill, C. J.

The plaintiff does not specify in his complaint the exact language used in the complaint in the Caldwell County case which he alleges constitutes the libelous statements of and concerning him. Nor does he set forth the substance thereof. It is apparent that, instead, he recites his conclusions as to the meaning, force, and effect of the words used by defendant in his complaint and affidavit and in the notice of summons published as substituted service of summons and notice of attachment. He alleges that this defendant in said instruments “accuses this plaintiff of the crime of embezzlement…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Madry v. Town of Scotland NeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. McGranahan v. DaharSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Stutts v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API