Legal Opinion

Seawell v. Chas. Cole & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeKsoN, J.

Another branch of this matter was before this Court. See Johnson, Admr., v. Leavitt, 188 N. C., p. 682.

The record discloses that the defendants’ counsel “thereupon demurred ore tenus for that the complaint does not state a cause of action. The court thereupon dictated to the clerk its order and judgment sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action, to which the plaintiff excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court.” No counsel appeared in this Court for the defendant, and the demurrer was not renewed in this Court. C..S.,.512, is as follows: “The demurrer must distinctly specify the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Greene County v. National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Corp. Commission v. Harnett County Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Leach v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Shaffer v. Morris BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Aldridge Motors, Inc. v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API