Legal Opinion
Perrell v. BEATY SERVICE COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 9, 1958No. 254PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The question drawn into focus by the demurrer is whether plaintiff is entitled to require payment of said judgment (Appendix A) by L. L. Ledbetter, Treasurer, out of cash or securities deposited with him by Beaty Service Company, Inc., hereinafter called Beaty, under agreement (Appendix E) dated July 26, 1938, between Beaty and L. L. Ledbetter, Treasurer. If this question is resolved in favor of plaintiff, the complaint alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; otherwise, it does not.
The said judgment was based on a verdict which established inter alia that O. R. Perrell was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Jones v. EpplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. . GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . SasseenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Cogdell v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Heath Ex Rel. Heath v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Town of Atlantic Beach v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.