Starbuck v. Town of Havelock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
The appeal, supplemented by the demurrer ore tenus made here, raises two questions: (1) Must the challenge of corporate existence be by quo warranto? (2) Is there any allegation in the complaint entitling plaintiffs to injunctive relief?
The wrongs which may be corrected by quo warranto are specified by statute. G.S. 1-515 and 516, G.S. 55-122 and G.S. 55A-50. None of these statutes apply to this action. This is not an action to determine a right to a public office nor to prevent the exercise of a franchise by a de facto corporation. This is an action to determine whether a de jure municipal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. Commissioners of Person CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Constantian v. Anson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Smith v. . WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Town of Saluda v. County of PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Campbell v. First Baptist Church of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- United Telephone Co. of Carolinas, Inc. v. Universal Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Moore v. Knightdale Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.