Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Brantley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1962No. 241PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The demurrers challenge the complaint upon two grounds: (1) Failure to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) misjoinder of parties and causes. The Court passes on a demurrer as a matter of law. If the facts alleged in a complaint constitute a defective statement of a good cause of action, judgment is entered sustaining the demurrer but permitting the plaintiff to amend. G.S. 1-131. Lumber Co. v. Pamlico County, 250 N.C. 686, 110 S.E. 2d 282. However, if the complaint shows the plaintiff does not have a cause of action, that is, the cause he attempts to allege is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Stephan v. Merchants Collateral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. BagleyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
  2. Martin v. Ju-Li Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Harris v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Bridges v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Miller v. Ruth's of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API