Parrish v. Brantley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The demurrers challenge the complaint upon two grounds: (1) Failure to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and (2) misjoinder of parties and causes. The Court passes on a demurrer as a matter of law. If the facts alleged in a complaint constitute a defective statement of a good cause of action, judgment is entered sustaining the demurrer but permitting the plaintiff to amend. G.S. 1-131. Lumber Co. v. Pamlico County, 250 N.C. 686, 110 S.E. 2d 282. However, if the complaint shows the plaintiff does not have a cause of action, that is, the cause he attempts to allege is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Stephan v. Merchants Collateral Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gilbert v. BagleyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
- Martin v. Ju-Li Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Harris v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bridges v. OatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Miller v. Ruth's of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.