Legal Opinion

Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1963No. 603PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

This appeal presents two questions: 1. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? 2. If so, do the facts alleged in the challenged portions of the answer constitute a defense to plaintiff’s alleged cause of action?

Defendants, in their demurrer ore tenus, asserted in general terms that the complaint did not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. G.S. 1-127 (6). They did not, so far as the record shows, “distinctly specify the grounds of objection to the complaint” and their demurrer “might well have been disregarded” by the court below. Griffin…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Valley Forge Gardens, Inc. v. James D. Morrissey, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Laird v. NelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Moore, Kelly & Reddish, Inc. v. Shannondale, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1968

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API