Legal Opinion

Mills v. Richardson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1954No. 457PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Did the court below, at the Second February (1954) Civil Term, have authority, upon withdrawal of plaintiff’s appeal, to strike out the judgment dismissing the action entered at the First February (1954) Civil Term? Authoritative decisions compel a negative answer.

The plaintiff, having appealed from the judgment entered at the First February (1954) Term, elected to abandon or withdraw her appeal. She had a legal right to do so.

However, upon abandonment or withdrawal of her appeal, the judgment from which her appeal was taken remained unchallenged. This was a final judgment, which by its…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Garrett v. . TrotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  3. McKee v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Caldwell v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Moore v. . PackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Montgomery Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Pruett v. PruettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. East Carolina Lumber Company v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API