Legal Opinion

Whaley v. Broadway Taxi Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1960No. 671PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Plaintiffs contend Judge Hobgood erred in denying their motion for an interlocutory injunction until the final determination of the action, and erred in dismissing the action and taxing them with the costs. Defendant contends Judge Hobgood treated the show cause order as a motion for a permanent injunction, and correctly denied the motion for an injunction, and correctly dismissed the action and taxed plaintiffs with the costs.

Judge Hobgood heard this matter “upon the motion of the plaintiffs for an injunction and return of the order to .show, cause.” The show cause order states that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Midland Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. Barrier v. TroutmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Mosteller v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Huggins v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Register v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API