Legal Opinion
State v. Heston
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 7, 1985No. 82-0486, 82-0491; CA A32135, A32136PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
The issue in this case is whether certain expenses incurred by the state Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) are costs that the court may order defendant to pay under ORS 161.665(1):
“The court may require a convicted defendant to pay as costs those expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant. Costs include the compensation of counsel appointed pursuant to ORS 135.045 or 135.050 and expenses approved under ORS 135.055(5). Costs shall not include expenses inherent in providing a constitutionally guaranteed jury trial or expenditures in connection with the maintenance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- State v. WashburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State of Washington v. Mariano Diaz-FariasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. FlajoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006