State v. Fuller
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
The sole question in this appeal which merits discussion is whether a sentencing court has authority to include among the conditions of probation the requirement that a defendant repay attorney fees and investigator fees that the county expended on his behalf because he was indigent at the time of trial. Such a sentence is authorized by ORS 161.665, 161.675 and 161.685,① enacted by the legislature in 1971. Oregon *154Laws 1971, ch. 743, §§ 80, 81 and 82, p 1899. Relying on James v. Strange, 407 US 128, 92 S Ct 2027, 32 L Ed *1552d 600 (1972), defendant argues it is unconstitutional to require…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- James v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Thomas v. HaslamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
- State v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.