Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Oregon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1974No. 73-5280PublishedCited by 342 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

In this case we are called upon to determine whether Oregon may constitutionally require a person convicted of a criminal offense to repay to the State the costs of providing him with effective representation of counsel, when he is indigent at the time of the criminal proceedings but subsequently acquires the means to bear the costs of his legal defense.

The petitioner Fuller pleaded guilty, on July 20, 1972, to an information charging him with sodomy in the third degree.1 At the hearing on the plea and in other court proceedings he was represented by a local member of the bar appointed by the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by342 opinions

  1. Johnson, Manley DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club of DuarteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Basaldua v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998

337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API