Legal Opinion

State v. Hastings

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1976No. 15-999, CA 4771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Upon trial by jury defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, ORS 164.135. The circuit court placed defendant on probation and as one of the conditions of probation, directed defendant to pay Washington County $378, $345 of this amount representing jurors’ fees paid by the county and $33 representing state’s witness fees. The only issue on appeal is whether the sentencing court had authority to order this payment.

The court in its discretion may require a convicted defendant to pay costs, ORS 161.665(1). ORS 161.665(2) specifically excludes the expenses of a jury trial as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. EarlsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. State v. Ferman-VelascoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. WashburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API