Utter v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Bridgewater, J.
The Department of Social and Health Services (Department) appeals from a superior court ruling that invalidated the Department’s claim for reimbursement from Keith Utter for costs relating to his competency evaluation and treatment pending criminal charges. We hold that RCW 10.01.160 is the appropriate statute under which the Department may obtain reimbursement from criminal defendants, the Department’s costs for competency evaluation and treatment are costs “specially incurred” by the State in prosecuting defendants, and the Department can obtain recovery of these costs only…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. SmitsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Union Ele. & Ware. Co., Inc. v. State Ex Rel. DotCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Union Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. Tiger Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.