Legal Opinion
State v. Washburn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 8, 1980No. 79-05042, CA 17565PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*159RICHARDSON, P.J.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 487.540. The judgment ordered him to pay a $300 fine, plus costs. The state filed a cost bill including a charge of $302.46, which was the amount of overtime pay for three sheriff’s deputies who testified at trial. The overtime was paid because they appeared and testified during their off-duty hours. Defendant appeals the assessment of the overtime pay as costs.
The trial court may require a convicted defendant to pay costs. ORS 161.665. That statute provides:
"(2) Costs shall be limited to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. HastingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. HestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. FlajoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.