Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Mariano Diaz-Farias

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 1, 2015No. 32583-1-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, C.J.

¶1 — Under RCW 10.01.160, a court may impose costs on a convicted criminal defendant at the time of sentencing, with “costs” for this purpose being “limited to expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant” or for other limited purposes not relevant here. RCW 10.01.160(2). “They cannot include expenses inherent in providing a constitutionally guaranteed jury trial or expenditures in connection with the maintenance and operation of government agencies that must be made by the public irrespective of specific violations of law.” Id.

¶2 Mariano Diaz-Farias pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Joshua J. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Jason Spears v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2025
  3. State Of Washington v. Joshua J. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State of Washington v. Jay Trevor PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State of Washington v. Juan Manual ReyesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API