Legal Opinion

State v. Flajole

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 2006No. 010533609; A120819PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

ORS 161.655(1) provides that, in a judgment of conviction, a trial court “may include in its sentence thereunder a provision that the convicted defendant pay as costs expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant.” At issue in this case is whether, after entry of a judgment of conviction sentencing defendant to a period of probation, the statute authorizes a trial court to order him to pay the costs of extraditing him from another state for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine whether he violated his probation. The trial court concluded that the statute…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. GileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API