State v. Flajole
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
ORS 161.655(1) provides that, in a judgment of conviction, a trial court “may include in its sentence thereunder a provision that the convicted defendant pay as costs expenses specially incurred by the state in prosecuting the defendant.” At issue in this case is whether, after entry of a judgment of conviction sentencing defendant to a period of probation, the statute authorizes a trial court to order him to pay the costs of extraditing him from another state for the purpose of conducting a hearing to determine whether he violated his probation. The trial court concluded that the statute…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. GileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Utter v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Utter v. STATE, DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020