Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 2, 2004No. 00C-42911; A115630PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the trial court that required him to pay $5,000 to the Oregon Department of Corrections, Fugitive Apprehension Unit, as restitution for his conviction for escape. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
An order or judgment for restitution is a sentence. State v. Edson, 329 Or 127, 130 n 1, 985 P2d 1253 (1999). We review the judgment for restitution to determine whether the trial court complied with the requirements of law in imposing the sentence. ORS 138.222(4)(a); State v. Hart, 329 Or 140, 144, 985 P2d 1260 (1999).
The following facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HartOregon Supreme Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. TupaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HerfurthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- People v. DanenbergerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- State v. BarrickMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Washington v. Mariano Diaz-FariasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.