Dick v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Albert Lee Stephens, City Attorney, and Charles S. Burnell, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Action to recover damages for the unlawful destruction of crops owned by the plaintiff on leased land. The defendants are the city of Los Angeles and three persons who constituted the board of public works, of that city. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Vermont Avenne, in the city of Los Angeles, runs in a northerly and southerly direction. It is crossed by Slauson Avenue, running in an easterly and westerly direction. The right of way of the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company adjoins and parallels Slauson Avenue on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Conniff v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Palmer v. WaddellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Stanford v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lampe v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by10 opinions
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Granone v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Renninger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Ambrosini v. Alisal Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mulder v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.