Legal Opinion

Archer v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1941No. L. A. 17613; L. A. 17612PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRAYNOR, J. —

Plaintiffs own land in Venice, a suburb of the city of Los Angeles. The land is located near La Ballona Lagoon, a body of water about two miles long and two miles wide, which empties into the Pacific Ocean and is fed by La Ballona Creek, a natural watercourse draining an area of about 134 square miles. A map of the area as it existed in 1893 shows that the waters descending from the hills followed no defined course until they reached lower La Ballona Creek. In the ensuing years, however, the area drained by the creek and its tributaries was transformed into residential and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Charles Travis and Jean Travis v. Harris Corp., Harris-Intertype Corporation, Sheridan Division and Bruno MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API