Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1894No. 19337PublishedCited by 58 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

The plaintiff and appellant here is a corporation and the owner of some thirty-five acres of land situate within the city of Los Angeles, and devoted to the purposes of a cemetery.

The action is brought against the city of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by the construction of an embankment across an alleged watercourse, near to and below the cemetery, in which a culvert was constructed of such small size, and at such an elevation above the natural surface, that it was insufficient and unable to *463carry off the water which in time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Gillham v. Madison County RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API